Post by account_disabled on Dec 23, 2023 20:52:42 GMT -6
Aquality of driver services which may lead to the expulsion of drivers from the platform determines the price of the service All the features listed exclude the idea that Uber could be considered a mere intermediary between drivers and passengers. On the other hand within the mixed service offered by the Uber platform without a doubt the transport is the main service that also provides the economic benefit. The Advocate General concludes by saying that the provision by which the passengerdriver relationship is maintained electronically is neither.
Autonomous according to point above nor main according to point Country Email List two above by reference to the provision of the transport service. Thus the service offered by Uber cannot be qualified as an information society service. We are rather in the situation of an a complete urban transport system to order. Conclusion Can taxi licenses be imposed on Uber Given the fact that the transport service is from an economic point of view the main element and because the service of maintaining the passengerdriver relationship through the application installed on the.
Amartphone is the secondary element the general advocate proposes to the Court to qualify the service offered by the Uber platform as being a transportation service . From this interpretation it follows that Ubers activity is not governed by the principle of free provision of services within information society services and that it must be subject to the conditions provided by the regulations of the member states in this case Barcelona Spain. Leave a reply Your email address will not be published.
